The current government (PPP) is fruit of democracy and common man is looking Pakistan getting down each passing day, but no any political party is able to stop (or has stopped) PPP. The current leadership (Mr. Zaradari and his puppets) is performing poorly but PTI is not calling for a LONG march to remove Zardari, nor the PML(N) is resigning or calling for LONG marches. So it seems, the protectors of secular democracy believes, once a person get on-board, he must have freedom to do whatever he want.
At a pic on FB (http://on.fb.me/HjvzsH), people asked, if Mr. Nawaz is so loyal with Pakistan, then why his party is not resigning in assemblies (or taking some big step to save the country)? People who are demanding this resign don't understand how the secular democracy operate. In secular democracy, in Pakistan, the US influence and plan who should come next. Once their puppets get on-board, they make sure nothing unusual happen to remove them, up to maximum possible level. Its the way in which one state (US and others) are controlling the world. This is what Iqbal means when he says, 'Democracy is just another name for Kingdomship'. In fact its more distructive than kingdomship, because in democracy the public mistakenly believes that its 'their' or the peoples' government.
The recent political anarchy in Lybia and other Arab countries to remove kingdomship, is not totaly conceived by their public but by western powers who know that if a democractic govervment come on-board, it would be easy to influence and control. And if one government fails, the would simply empower and support other party who can do their job.
At a pic on FB (http://on.fb.me/HjvzsH), people asked, if Mr. Nawaz is so loyal with Pakistan, then why his party is not resigning in assemblies (or taking some big step to save the country)? People who are demanding this resign don't understand how the secular democracy operate. In secular democracy, in Pakistan, the US influence and plan who should come next. Once their puppets get on-board, they make sure nothing unusual happen to remove them, up to maximum possible level. Its the way in which one state (US and others) are controlling the world. This is what Iqbal means when he says, 'Democracy is just another name for Kingdomship'. In fact its more distructive than kingdomship, because in democracy the public mistakenly believes that its 'their' or the peoples' government.
The recent political anarchy in Lybia and other Arab countries to remove kingdomship, is not totaly conceived by their public but by western powers who know that if a democractic govervment come on-board, it would be easy to influence and control. And if one government fails, the would simply empower and support other party who can do their job.